Safety or usability: Why not both? Towards referential auth in k8s
Watch talk on YouTubeA talk by Google and Microsoft with the premise of better auth in k8s.
Baselines
- Most access controllers have read access to all secrets -> They are not really designed for keeping these secrets
- Result: CVEs
- Example: Just use ingress, nginx, put in some Lua code in the config and e voilà: Service account token
- Fix: No more fun
Basic solutions
- Separate Control (the controller) from data (the ingress)
- Namespace limited ingress
Current state of cross namespace stuff
- Why: Reference TLS cert for gateway API in the cert team’s namespace
- Why: Move all ingress configs to one namespace
- Classic Solution: Annotations in contour that references a namespace that contains all certs (rewrites secret to certs/secret)
- Gateway Solution:
- Gateway TLS secret ref includes a namespace
- ReferenceGrant pretty much allows referencing from X (Gateway) to Y (Secret)
- Limits:
- Has to be implemented via controllers
- The controllers still have read all - they just check if they are supposed to do this
Goals
Global
- Grant access to controller to only resources relevant for them (using references and maybe class segmentation)
- Allow for safe cross namespace references
- Make it easy for API devs to adopt it
Personas
- Alex API author
- Kai controller author
- Rohan Resource owner
What our stakeholders want
- Alex: Define relationships via ReferencePatterns
- Kai: Specify controller identity (Serviceaccount), define relationship API
- Rohan: Define cross namespace references (aka resource grants that allow access to their resources)
Result of the paper
Architecture
- ReferencePattern: Where do i find the references -> example: GatewayClass in the gateway API
- ReferenceConsumer: Who (Identity) has access under which conditions?
- ReferenceGrant: Allow specific references
POC
- Minimum access: You only get access if the grant is there AND the reference actually exists
- Their basic implementation works with the kube API
Open questions
- Naming
- Make people adopt this
- What about namespace-scoped ReferenceConsumer
- Is there a need of RBAC verb support (not only read access)
Alternative
- Idea: Just extend RBAC Roles with a selector (match labels, etc.)
- Problems:
- Requires changes to Kubernetes core auth
- Everything bus list and watch is a pain
- How do you handle AND vs OR selection
- Field selectors: They exist
- Benefits: Simple controller implementation
Meanwhile
- Prefer tools that support isolation between controller and data-plane
- Disable all non-needed features -> Especially scripting